Compare

CustomCoach vs Quenza

Named, scored instruments against a large activity library

The short version

Quenza wins volume, automated pathways and a native client app. If the job is sending lots of homework that clients complete on a phone, it is the right tool.

CustomCoach wins when the instrument has a name, a scoring key and a band you will stand behind — Rosenberg, SWLS, GAS, Civil Service 10 — and when a coach must review interpretation before the coachee sees it.

Where each one fits

Reach for Quenza when you want a large science-inspired activity library, automated multi-step pathways, and a polished iOS/Android app. Pair it with a booking tool; scheduling is not built in.

Reach for CustomCoach when you need published scoring (reverse items, subscales, incomplete → Unknown), competency language an organisation already uses, Johari or 360 next to the engagement, and a hold on generated text.

CustomCoachQuenza
Best atScored instruments and organisational programmesHomework volume, pathways, client app
LibraryNamed psychometrics, 5 interactive programmes, competency frameworks400+ activities plus an activity builder
ScoringEngine with reverse items, bands, score historyForms and activities; not published scoring keys
InterpretationCoach generates, edits, approves — then the coachee sees itClient-facing activities; no review hold as the product
360 / peersJohari peer links; Portraits 360 on the engagementNot a 360 product
Mobile appResponsive web. Native app is not the wedgeiOS and Android client app
Scheduling / checkoutNot built in. Bring your calendar and paymentsNot built in. Bring a booking tool
Price shape£49 / £129 / £349 a month (GBP). 14-day Professional trialFrom $25/month for 10 clients (Spark)

The honest trade-off

These are different jobs. A Head of Talent running Civil Service-language coaching with 360 will be underserved by an activity library. A health coach sending daily worksheets will be underserved by CustomCoach. Pricing is not comparable until you model the job.